© 2025 WXPR
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Line 5 fight goes on as tribe sues U.S. Army Corps

FILE - Pipeline used to carry crude oil sits at the Superior, Wis., terminal of Enbridge Energy, June 29, 2018.  (AP Photo/Jim Mone, File)
Jim Mone/AP
/
AP
FILE - Pipeline used to carry crude oil sits at the Superior, Wis., terminal of Enbridge Energy, June 29, 2018. (AP Photo/Jim Mone, File)

The fight over the Line 5 pipeline continues as the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa sues the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The tribe claims the Corps' permitting approval for Canadian oil company Enbridge’s construction of a 41-mile pipeline relocation project is unlawful. A section of the more than 70-year-old pipeline has been operating illegally on the Bad River Band's Reservation for more than a decade.

Beth Wallace, Great Lakes climate and energy director for the National Wildlife Federation, said despite decisionmakers fighting for years to shut the project down, legal maneuvering and a lack of energy planning has made this nearly impossible to achieve. She stressed the reroute to keep it running still poses a direct threat to tribal lands and natural resources.

"This piece of infrastructure has already set the stage for other corporations to violate, or attempt to violate, critical laws," she explained. "It's really important that leadership aren't creating a dangerous precedent where our Great Lakes protections are on the line to foreign oil corporations."

Proponents, like the Wisconsin Jobs and Energy Coalition, are calling the lawsuit “baseless.” They say the project has been thoroughly analyzed and would create hundreds of jobs and provide energy to the state and region. A federal judge ordered Line 5 to be shut down by June of 2026 but that decision is under appeal.

The lawsuit claims Enbridge’s relocation plans place Line 5 directly in the headwaters of the Bad River Band’s reservation, requiring drilling that could cause environmental damage. Wallace emphasized that the issue of whether Line 5 is needed isn't being properly addressed or evaluated in terms of Wisconsin’s clean energy portfolio or goals.

"What Line 5 is showing us is that our systems are so broken that we can have a foreign oil corporation challenging both tribal and state sovereignty rights and Great Lakes laws for almost a decade and continuing to make $1 to $2 million of profit, every single day, just through legal challenges," she continued.

Wallace said there are alternatives to Line 5 that would create more jobs, boost U.S. domestic energy supplies, and make use of other transportation sources, including existing Enbridge pipelines with available capacity – all while upholding Great Lakes laws and tribal and state sovereignty.

Judith Ruiz-Branch is an award-winning journalist with over a decade of experience as a reporter/producer for TV, radio, print and podcast news.
Up North Updates
* indicates required
Related Content